Government capitalism, democratic budget and economic choices
By Nneka Okumazie
The features that have become architecture[d] to democracy through different eras have failed to resist the force power of uniform capitalism.
Everything that made a republic or democracy work in the past – was mostly behavioral sets, already a norm for the people, or most of them, or the direction in which they were collectively headed – as stated .
It wasn’t democracy for the name of the thing and then it works. It was mostly we’re about this, or should be about this – and for those reasons, we should buy in and then it works, most of the time.
However, at present, whatever democracy is in most countries of the world, it can be described as capitalism, the predator, with politics as its prey, and the currents of capital in the capital.
Since this uniform capitalism is regimented, with indicators appearing or collapsing, the only organization that can largely withstand its turmoil is the government.
Governments have already redefined what loss means. The concept of profit is predominant in capitalism, but loss is a more important factor.
For governments, flexibility regarding losses, lack of competition, source of income in any form, access to debt, etc.
Although an administration can fail due to inflation, losses, etc. and that there can be an old regime, the organization of government resumes and capitalism advances.
Countries around the world have varying amounts of infusion of government capitalism [across groups and individuals] but if the most viable business is government, what does it hurt to get into the action, especially when there are no losses – per capita?
There are different conceptions of corruption, some disguised, others supererogatory, there is not much care because the loss is nothing.
So the configuration that should be for the people becomes a uniform capitalism – designed for the few.
There is a limit to the things for capitalism to work – the limits of money, value, credit, supply, product, access, etc.
In past centuries, with fewer people, it is possible to have certain necessities without the necessary capital, but no longer impossible now, and then a population that cannot simply fit in.
Capitalism is the game, few win and stay. They know he slips and avoids being landed.
A major mistake of current capitalism is the refusal to redefine loss or what losses mean. Losses should have at least a thousand definitions – not the few things that mean below cost, expiration, etc.
Already the world is inundated with garbage. Waste parallels loss in some form.
The possibility of waste for most products should reveal what waste should mean, so as not to avoid it, but to accommodate it and not to fail.
The government is already doing it.
Also, productivity does not respect waste because no alternative to known productivity [not decoupling or degrowth] even if waste would be the result. So the losses – rigid with capitalism are precipitated.
This capitalism cannot adapt to the current world, with all the balances that must be kept, by favoring a few.
The new constants in the economy, this and that, are just the wrong problem and the wrong direction, for a system that should be greatly expanded.
The authority of capitalism has also moved away from the real effort it takes to create change or make progress.
Since the laws of capitalism must be obeyed, what obeys has value, what disobeys is worth nothing.
What disobeys capitalism might be what is needed and create new opportunities, but there might be nothing for it.
Although some governments try certain projects and policies in this direction, certainly limited experiences and others that may work never go wrong.
Moreover, as the behavior must obey capitalism, the common evolution develops in this direction, that most people want the excellence of capitalism even if they are not unique and that they are not only replaceable but make no existential difference.
Many countries around the world are accusing poor leadership, but maybe no one knows what to do, because the only way to think is how to position yourself to access the currency.
Problems cannot be solved because that is not the goal.
The impossible is not only projects, but can also be real behaviors that do not prioritize capitalism.
For some people, they are destabilized by the problems of capitalism, and because of what societies see as signs of accomplishment, they become more tangled up in situations that they would need to maintain capitalism, not gender. traits that can risk total peril – in pursuit of a collective goal. progress.
Governments around the world are centralized capitalist dummies.
Politics is for the benefit of the player.
That’s a shame.
For people who become collateral damage, what a loss.
The speed in the cockpit is too different from that of the fuselage. This is not the journey that everyone should be comfortable with.
[Luke 21:6, As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.]