Adventures in Lesbian Fiction:

Crybaby Butch

by Judith Frank

Review byThe Plaid Adder
Comments:plaidder@mindspring.com


Disclaimer: Some of these reviews will contain spoilers. All were generated after discussing the books in a lesbian book group to which I belong. However, the opinions represented below are my own, and nobody else connected with the group should be held responsible for them.


Crybaby Butch is one of the first novels I've read in a while that  really sucked me in. This is all the more surprising when you
consider that the plot, when summarized, is going to sound really  boring. The main character, Anna, is an English PhD. who has just  been dumped by her long-term lover and been kicked in the teeth by  the academic job market. Not having landed an academic job, Anna is hanging around Chicago in an apartment she now can't really pay for, teaching comp at Northwestern and teaching adult literacy at a place called Pathways. Fortunately, we hear virtually nothing about  teaching comp at Northwestern. Most of the book is devoted to the intersecting but not exactly intertwined lives of Anna, the eponymous crybaby butch--overeducated, emotionally vulnerable, idealistic yet cynical, and a tetch prone to self-pity--and Chris, an older, working-class stone butch who is taking Anna's class.

The main business of the novel, as I see it, is to get the reader to explore the question of what these two characters do and don't have in common with each other, contrasting Anna's despairing attempts to pull herself and her life together with the turbulence that learning to read is creating for Chris in her world. Both are dealing with much of the same pain and many of the same obstacles. Chris and Anna are both still grieving the fathers they loved and lost; both are underemployed and financially strapped; while Chris finds herself paralyzed at the thought of having to write a resume, Anna can't seem to face writing the extra chapter that her readers have asked for so that her book will get published and eventually get her an academic job; and both appear to have questionable taste in women. Despite all this, differences in age, class, experience, and personality thwart most of Anna's attempts to connect with Chris; and it doesn't help that Anna's desire to help Chris take control of her life is complicated by her own need to have her own butch identity reaffirmed by bonding with a 'real' butch from the bad old
days. While Anna and Chris circle each other warily, the book also introduces us to the lives of Anna's other students, Anna's love life, Chris's increasingly troubled relationship with her partner of twenty years, and a surprising amount of information about how to teach reading and writing to adult learners.

I have no idea whether that summary is at all tempting to anyone who has never had to grapple with the whole butch/femme identity
question; so let me just tell you straight up all the reasons I liked this book.

Reason #1: Unlike most stories about teaching, this one is actually convincing, and yet still compelling. Anna's students are not exceptionally talented; there is no unrecognized genius among them waiting to be born; they do not miraculously jump from functional illiteracy to performing Hamlet; and it is made increasingly clear as the novel progresses that these students are daily facing crises and dangers that education alone will not help them with. A fair amount of the book is spent in Anna's classroom, following the progress of a particular class as it either works or
doesn't. I had always assumed that the reason so many films about teachers are so head-bleedingly awful is that actual teaching, to those not participating in it at the time, is about as exciting to watch as paint drying. Crybaby Butch actually makes the day-to-day mechanics of trying to run a classroom engrossing, and not just for people who do it for a living. The book group was nearly unanimous in their enthusiasm for this aspect of the novel, and I think this is mainly due to three things. One, Frank does a very good job of conveying to the (presumably literate) reader what it's like to be functionally illiterate. Some of this comes through descriptions of Chris's life outside the classroom, but a lot of it comes through the students' perspectives in the classroom. Two, Frank uses Anna's perspective to give the readers the theory behind the concrete tasks being done in the classroom, and to get them to share her intense concern about whether the exercises that she thought were a great idea back in her apartment are going to work in real life. This all has to do with the third reason, which leads into


Reason #2: Frank is in serious violation of some of the cardinal rules about point-of-view, and God bless her for it.

The novel begins with a second-person monologue from Anna's perspective about her own questionable butch identity, which thanks to the pronoun sleight-of-hand becomes the reader's questionable butch identity. Then it shifts to third person limited, and you think, OK, that was just a stylistic flourish to get the first page of the query sample past the agent, now we're settling down to normalcy. Then, once Anna gets into the classroom, you discover that actually, that third person POV is not going to be stable at all. During the classroom scenes, the perspective jumps all over the room from moment to moment--from Anna to Chris to Vanessa to Cheryl to Robert to Brandy and back again. While I have no doubt that an army of agents and editors kept sending this book back to Frank and demanding that she pick a head and stay in it until the scene is over, it is my contention that this head-hopping is the main reason that the classroom scenes work. It allows you to get a 360 degree view of the learning experience, showing you at almost the same moment Anna's ideas about what she's trying to teach them and the students' very different experiences of the lesson she's running; and although Anna is privileged as the main character, the students' reactions reveal the mistakes and misunderstandings that her assumptions produce, and shows them piling up moment by moment. There are occasional interruptions of second person, including a section in which Chris tells "you," the reader, how it was that "you" never learned to read. While some of the book groupers found this distracting, to me it was part of the book's depiction of teaching, and of community and connection in
general. The head-hopping shows why success in the classroom depends on being able to see yourself through your students' eyes--a skill which you must keep trying to learn, but which you will never actually be able to master. The second person sections perform the seductions, the complexities, and the dangers of identification--a major theme worked out through Anna's fraught relationship with Chris, and commented on in the subplot involving Leslie Feinberg's Stone Butch Blues. Anna gives the book to Chris thinking that it will empower her; although Anna is not totally wrong, Chris's relationship with both the story and its characters and the book as a physical object is stormy, troubled, and suffused with the reawakened pain of old and deep wounds. Ultimately, Anna is forced to accept the fact that she will never 'reach' Chris, and Chris is forced to realize that Anna has given her something valuable along with all the trouble. Which brings me to

Reason #3: There is no Hollywood ending.

There is a certain amount of melodrama at the end, which makes me like the end less than the rest of it; but it's not precisely the kind of melodrama that the Dreamworks team would have come up with, and that prevents it from ruining the entire experience. There is some progress made by both of the main characters, and some progress made by most of the students in Anna's class. And that's really about all you can hope for in any teaching situation: some progress made. The book lets you see why having made some progress after months of underpaid daily slogging is uniquely rewarding while also uniquely frustrating, and that's what I mean when I say that this is one of the few stories about teaching that gets it. There is still a lot unresolved and a lot of questions unanswered; but to me that's a necessary part of this kind of story.

There are, of course, some bad things. In general, I would say that the book, while not misogynistic, is kind of down on femmes. Although there are some sympathetic and attractive femme characters, Chris's partner Kathleen is the closest thing the novel has to a villain, and she and Anna seem to share a kind of noirish attitude toward the femmes they are drawn to: women are trouble, but you can't stay away from them. Occasionally, Frank slips off the tightrope and succumbs to the temptation of coddling her surrogate character (who's obviously Anna). Having met my share of graduate students and their hangers-on, I could have done with less of the "Anna-hangs-out-with-her-graduate-student-buddies" line of things. And while all the students in Anna's class are well-realized enough to be interesting--particularly Robert, the taciturn Vietnam vet whose interior monologues suggest a gift of observation that simply can't find a means of expression--the novel is clearly much
less interested in them than in Chris.

Still, this is a smart, self-questioning, and compelling treatment of material that has been mandhandled by many, from the real drama of teaching to the limitations of lesbian community and the complexity of butch identification. I would say it's one of the best recent novels we've done, and would recommend it to anyone who likes lesbians, teaching, reading, or some combination of the three.


Back to the Adder's Lair